Before the apostles
do anything, Peter gives a little discourse about the need for a new apostle to
replace Judas Iscariot and he ends with this:
21 Wherefore
of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went
in and out among us,
22 Beginning
from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must
one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection.
23 And
they appointed two, Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and
Matthias.
24 And
they prayed, and said, Thou, Lord, which knowest the hearts of all men, shew
whether of these two thou hast chosen,
25 That
he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by
transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.
26 And
they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered
with the eleven apostles. (Acts
1:21-26)
The lot process they
used is an interesting one, as it gives us an indication of how the apostles
operated.
We might think this
casting their lots was a matter of choosing a name out of a container, but that
wasn’t it—that is chance. What it
was was every apostle gave a lot according to who he felt God had shown him was
to be apostle. (Everyone
seems to think that the apostles “cast lots,” but the wording is very
particular. It is different from
everywhere else. It says “they
gave forth their lots,” meaning they each had a choice and signified it with a
token of some sort and “the lot fell upon Matthias” shows the unity of those
choices.)
This wasn’t a
situation where majority rules.
This was a case where unanimous rules. They had to be united, just like their testimonies had to be
united. If it were merely a choice
by man, there would be all sorts of opinions, but they needed God to show them,
ALL of them, who God chose, therefore there could only be one answer.
I also notice they
studied the matter out first, and they got their best options as far as that
went. Peter discussed the
necessity of calling a new apostle and how it must be one who could be a
witness of the resurrection and they chose two men who could fill that
requirement.
Then they prayed for
revelation to know which one of those two men God had chosen. I suppose that if they got no answer
either way, they would have gone back to considering candidates again.
The neat thing is
that the Lord doesn’t confine this confirming testimony to just the
apostles. He will give it to other
members as well. We can receive it
about prophets, apostles, other general authorities, stake presidents, bishops,
and so on. Just last year our
stake had a new stake presidency appointed and during the meeting as the new
stake president spoke, I received a confirming witness he was called of God. It wasn’t a dramatic rushing wind,
rather it was the Spirit saying at the back of my mind, “Yes, this is the new stake president.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment