21 And
the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to
the feet, I have no need of you.
22 Nay,
much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are
necessary: (1 Cor. 12:21-22)
I’m glad Paul took the trouble to explain this about the body of the church because it helps me consider my own ignorance about my fellow Saints.
I recall in my previous ward there was
an aged sister and her husband who, when they were called on in church classes,
tended to make comments unrelated or only tangentially associated to the topic
of discussion. The husband in
particular seemed to like bringing up screwy quotations by Brigham Young in a
way that often subverted rather than supported the points the teacher was
trying to make. I remember this
brother bearing testimony on three separate fast Sundays that the Savior fell
down three times in the garden of Gethsemane. He placed a special emphasis on the falls and the number of
falls that I couldn’t understand. (Even more puzzling was that it never says in
scripture that Christ fell three times..)
His wife would bear emotional testimony in a wandering sort of way,
working in her profound grief over her grandchildren living half the world away
from her. As a writer interested
in skillful crafting of prose, I was often embarrassed for them. Sometimes I had to stop listening, but
other times I just tried to understand the feeling they were trying to
express. Later, much became clear
to me when this sister was put in a nursing home with dementia because her
husband was too feeble and fall-prone to take care of her himself.
I think of this couple when I read the above
verses, and I’ve often pondered in what way they were necessary to our ward if
their discourse wasn’t linear or profound.
Eventually I realized that they set a
great example of love of family and love of the gospel, especially in old
age. They presented a stalwart
picture of what it means to endure to the
end. Even as her mental faculties
degenerated, her commitment shone through. Even as his legs weakened and his balance wavered, his
dedication was rock solid. Their
testimonies might wander or seem impenetrable, but they still felt and
recognized the Spirit, then stood to bear witness in the best way they
could. Not only that, their
weaknesses became an opportunity for our ward to be charitable, to be saintly,
to bear with them. I didn’t hear
anyone express scorn, unkindness, or impatience toward them, not even raillery,
whether public or private. This
couple was treated with respect and love just like everybody else. We were all made better people because
they were with us.
If, say, the hand ever says to the
foot, “I have no need of thee,” I conclude that the hand doesn’t know what
pressure and difficulty the foot labors under. Neither does the hand recognize what the foot can do and does
do for the hand.
How about you? When have you as a “head” or “eye” learned
you needed the “hand” or “foot”?
2 comments:
I really like how you applied this scripture to the judging/loving others.
Sometimes it is hard for me to understand others - how they tick and work. Maybe if I looked at it the way you suggest (I'm a foot, and the other person is a hand), then I will be not only more patient, but I will also see how my relationship with them can benefit each of us.
Sundepb 3
Hi Catania,
It's hard for me too. The example in this post illustrates one case where I happened to figure it out. Even then, it took more than a year of distance from them.
I really hope I can learn to appreciate more without needing that distance and time intervening.
Post a Comment