1 And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.2 And Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father’s house.3 Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul.4 And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments, even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle. (1 Sam. 18:1-4)
In the church we have a whole lesson on the friendship
between David and Jonathan, and I think there is a lot to look at, so I want to
spend some time on it.
The suddenness of this friendship is startling, as is the
strength of it, which is one of the reasons why a certain segment of people
think it was a homosexual relationship.
However, we can understand it better if we consider what we know of both
David and Jonathan.
- They both had done acts of military valor. Jonathan had assaulted a Philistinegarrison with only one other person as backup. David had faced and slain Goliath the giant. They had both faced steep odds.
- Their valor was on their own initiative.
- They had both gone into those battles speaking the faith they had in God to deliver them and Israel.
- They both had experienced miracles in the Lord’s help.
- Their acts ultimately resulted in the Israelite army taking courage and fighting manfully, with a victorious outcome.
For both these men, their valor had arisen out of their
character and their steadfast faith in God. They were both men who would engage themselves in a good
cause, even if it was personally dangerous to them, even if they hadn’t been
commanded.
Now, something tells me that when a person has these
character traits, they immediately recognize others who have these same
traits….and they LOVE them.
Because here’s a person you don’t have to persuade into faith or push
them to get involved or pep-talk them.
They are all ready and rarin’ to go.
Jonathan instantly recognizes this in David. And because they both have strong faith
and devotion to God, neither of them are going to want to do anything wrong, so
they can have profound confidence in one another. They can be a huge help to each other, and Jonathan really
wants that. So he and David enter
into a covenant with each other.
We don’t quite know the exact terms of the covenant they
made, but we can see through the rest of 1 Samuel there was a protective
element to it, that they would protect each other and warn each other of
danger. David even appeals to
Jonathan at one point that Jonathan would be the one to kill him if David
sinned in any way rather than taking him to King Saul for justice (see 1 Samuel
20:8), so there is an element of policing each other. They also renew their covenant together on several occasions.
This is no idle thing to make this covenant. It is tested in painful ways when
Jonathan finds his father turning against David. Jonathan has to find ways of honoring his father while still
keeping his covenant to David. At
one point King Saul reproaches Jonathan, “do not I know that thou hast chosen
the son of Jesse to thine own confusion…?” (1 Samuel 20:30) It would certainly cause some confusion
and difficulty to Jonathan, but I think his covenant with David helps him
escape being affected by his father’s jealousy and suspicion. I think fulfilling his obligations to
that covenant allowed him to do good at a dark time when his father was sinking
further and further into sin and violence and murderousness. Jonathan stood up for David to his
father at least two separate times, warned David of danger at least once (and
possibly maintained a network of messengers to continue to warn him), and
visited him at least once to encourage him in the Lord.
What does Jonathan want from David in this covenant? At the beginning it is hard to tell,
but further into their story we see that Jonathan wants David to show him “the
kindness of the Lord, that I die not” and also to spare Jonathan’s family when
the Lord finally helps him triumph over his enemies. The tradition of that time and the cultures around them was
that the king of the new dynasty would kill all the family of the old dynasty
to ensure there was no one left as a focus of rebellion, and Jonathan hoped to
avoid that fate for his family.
And David does honor this
covenant.
Do you have a friend that is close to you that you could
imagine making this kind of covenant with? I have a few that I could have trusted them so far.
I must point out that this kind of covenant is twisted for
evil among secret combinations.
Only among those who are determined to serve the Lord at all hazards is
it a good thing for society. And
even with David and Jonathan as good as they were, their road wasn’t smooth.
Much is made in commentaries of Jonathan stripping off his
robe and garments to give to David along with his weapons. People think that Jonathan and David
both knew already that David was someday to be king. However, I’m not so sure about this. Yes, Samuel the prophet
knew he was anointing David to be king, but did it follow that he had to tell
David? Did David have to know in
order to do all those brave things he did? Maybe not.
In fact, if he was a man after the Lord’s heart, he was going to do what
he did because that’s the kind of man he was, and the anointing would give him
more of the Lord’s spirit. The
Lord could bring him to the throne without him knowing that was the plan. Jonathan’s giving David his
clothes and weapons could just as well have been blindly anticipatory.
At the moment, however, Jonathan probably gave up his robe
and weapons to David as the first major act he could do to fulfill the covenant
he had just made with David. To
protect David better, he gave him the clothes of authority and better weapons
to defend himself. This
communicated to everyone that no one could mess with David without royalty
getting involved… which of course would get the rest of Israel involved. He was to be treated as if he were
royalty himself.
Yet another thing about this act of clothing David is that
it demonstrates Jonathan’s humility.
He’s not so in love with his status as crown prince that he minds
someone else wearing the tokens of authority and power, nor does he mind a
friend wearing them. It is like he
wants to bring David up to his level, which is an awesome characteristic of a
friend.
I think in Jonathan’s friendship to David we can see a type
of Christ’s friendship to us.
Christ wants to bring us up to His level. When we follow Him and do the same things He does, He calls
us His friends, rather than his servants. He shares His power with His friends and He binds us
to Him by covenants. He clothes us
in the temple with power and authority. He hopes that someday in eternity we will get to sit
with him on the throne with the Father.
2 comments:
The nature of our interpretation of David and Jonathan is a great example of how the assumptions we bring to scripture affect our interpretation of them.
I have had a friend like Jonathan and so I see my own friendship in the story and believe David and Jonathan acted as we did. Others who are homosexual will no doubt see their own experiances in the story. Their conclusions are well supported if we look to Greek soldiers as a model.
Take also your mention of the anointing of David. You approach the scriptures assuming them to be an accurate reselling of historical events and look for expiation for how David may not have known his fate. Others would examine that the story was obviously written long after the events by someone favorable to the Davidic dynasty and assume the entire story of the anointing was made up later whole cloth to justify and give legitimacy to the political coup that occurs.
It's not that either of these interpretations are unjustified by the evidence, it's a matter of what assumptions we start with.
This is fundamental to the confusion Joseph felt when he said he could not find answers by an appeal to the Bible. It is core to our belief in the need for a living prophet, who may not satisfy our historical curiosity by explaining every detail of the past but can give us clear commandments for how to conduct ourselves in the present.
Hi Gilgamesh; it's true that our assumptions are a key (and often unexamined) part of our interpretations of scripture. Sometime we don't realize what they are until something makes us re-examine them.
Post a Comment