Behold, the heaven and the heaven
of heavens is the Lord’s
thy God,
the earth also,
with all that therein is.
(Deuteronomy
10:14)
I ran across this verse today in my
scripture reading. I saw that phrase
“heaven of heavens” and I realized it was essentially a mention of the highest
degree of the celestial kingdom.
In Deuteronomy!
Compare it with a term we are more
familiar with—“holy of holies”—which refers to the most holy place in the
temple. It is the most holy of all
the holy places. So the heaven of
heavens is the most heavenly place of all the heavens—the celestial kingdom at
its highest degree.
Clearly we don’t give Moses enough
credit. Yes, the Israelites may have rejected the higher law, but Moses didn’t,
and with the Melchizedek priesthood, which holds the keys of the mysteries, he
was not prevented from gaining greater knowledge of the eternities.
Is this the only place “heaven of heavens” occurs in the
scriptures? No. It is mentioned in four other places in
the Old Testament.
But will God indeed dwell on the
earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much
less this house that I have builded? (1 Kings 8:27)
This is Solomon speaking during the dedication of the temple
that he built.
But who is able to build him an
house, seeing the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain him? who am I then, that I should build him an house, save only
to burn sacrifice before him? (2 Chronicles 2:6)
This is Chronicles’ version of many of the events that
occurred in Kings, but we get something extra here where Solomon speaks as he
is deciding to build the temple.
It sounds like Solomon felt very overwhelmed by the task of making
something fine enough to be a worthy house of God.
But will God in very deed dwell
with men on the earth? behold, heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain
thee; how much less this house which I have built! (2 Chronicles 6:18)
This is part of Chronicles’ version of the dedicatory prayer
for Solomon’s temple.
(I have to point out that this idea that heaven and the
heaven of heavens cannot contain God is a hyperbole and not literal. We know this because of Joseph Smith’s first
vision in which he saw Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ were two separate and
distinct corporeal beings. Also,
the idea that heaven can’t contain God is logically paradoxical. If we consider heaven as the
environment around God and then compare it to a bag around a cat, it would be
like saying no bag is big enough to hold the cat. But then the bag has to expand. But the cat is too big. So the bag must expand. Leave it to Solomon the wise to come up with religious
paradoxes, huh? Again the whole
purpose of this hyperbole was to express his sense of overwhelm about building
a temple fit for God.)
Sorry for the digression there..
The last mention of heaven of heavens is in Nehemiah.
Thou, even
thou, art Lord
alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the
earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host
of heaven worshippeth thee. (Nehemiah 9:6)
The time period is after the Jews have returned to rebuild
the wall of Jerusalem. This is
part of a prayer given by Levites when the Jews gathered to fast and confess
their sins.
After this, I thought I’d look to see if there was anywhere
that used the term “highest heaven,” and it is only used in the section heading
of D&C 131, where celestial marriage is revealed as essential to obtaining
the highest degree of the celestial kingdom. In 2
Corinthians 12, Paul tells of being caught up into the “third heaven” to see
and hear unspeakable things.
It is nice to know these things are touched on in the Bible,
albeit very lightly.
3 comments:
Apparently the wicked priests (or whoever) didn't get rid of ALL the plain and precious parts. Thanks for sharing.
Good catch.
Curious, though. Could it be a literal belief that the dome of the sky had another dome above it. It's own sky, in other words?
Or it could be parallel to the common Mormon belief that God the Father has a Father. In other words, that there is a heaven that stands in relation to our heaven as our heaven stands to us.
Still a very interesting phrase you've found, though, and clear evidence that the Old Testament gospel included some elements that haven't been spelled out in the Bible.
Adam, those options are intriguing to consider.
I personally am going to go with the idea that heaven of heavens refers to a location, rather than a person. And considering Moses had a vision of creation, we probably can rule out the "dome on top of the dome of the sky" notion.
Post a Comment