In the story of Joseph in Egypt, there’s a place where
Joseph’s brothers return for food for the second time to Egypt, bringing
Benjamin and double money because their money had been mysteriously returned to
them before and they thought it was an oversight. They are invited to Joseph’s
house, and they worry they are about to be taken advantage of and fear the
returned money will be used as the pretext, so they explain their situation to
Joseph’s steward before going into Joseph’s house.
The steward’s answer is curious:
And he said, Peace be to you, fear not: your God, and the God of your
father, hath given you treasure in your sacks: I had your money. And he brought
Simeon out unto them. (Genesis 43:23)
The steward’s answer is curious because by speaking of “your
God” we see he speaks to Joseph’s brothers as one who does not share that
belief. It hints that Joseph did
not require those who worked for him to share his beliefs and that he let them
be free about it too. It also
hints that the steward has not only been told who Joseph’s brothers are, but he
knows they believe in the same God Joseph does.
It is also interesting that the steward speaks to Joseph’s
brothers in terms of their beliefs
(instead of his own) in order to reassure them. That shows a rather astonishing respect for them and their
religion, even though he doesn’t share it. All of these factors combined together paint a picture of a
very sophisticated kind of freedom and respect. It may be that he learned this
from Joseph’s example.
We get another hint that Joseph was sensitive to the
particular sensibilities of the Egyptians when we are told about Joseph’s
eating arrangements for himself, his brothers, and the Egyptians in his
household:
And they set on for him by himself,
and for them by themselves, and for the Egyptians, which did eat with him, by
themselves: because the Egyptians might not eat bread with the Hebrews; for
that is an abomination unto the Egyptians.
(Genesis 43:32)
It seems peculiar that the Egyptians wouldn’t eat with
Hebrews. Some commentaries think this was because the Hebrews ate and herded
around animals the Egyptians worshiped, which is understandable, even if
peculiar. But Joseph didn’t force
the Egyptians of his household to do what they considered abominable, even if they served him.
Joseph seems to have been one who allowed freedom of
conscience and religion among those around him. It is probable he learned to
value it while he was a slave in Potiphar’s house. It is also possible that his example of forbearance was a
positive recommendation for his religion to the Egyptians.
0 comments:
Post a Comment